Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
181. Sticky:Dev Blog: Fifty-Nine Down - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Alara IonStorm wrote: Fon Revedhort wrote: That's not enough to justify flying Battleships over convenient tech1/tech2 stuff in medium-sized class. Damage difference is not high enough. That is because the Raven is short a Launcher and t...
- by Fon Revedhort - at 2012.11.15 09:29:00
|
182. Sticky:Dev Blog: Fifty-Nine Down - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Alara IonStorm wrote: Fon Revedhort wrote: So Cruise Missiles are left behind for further expansions/patches? I don't think they need to be touched at all anymore. I mean they just buffed Fury Accuracy and Dmg / Precision are getting the s...
- by Fon Revedhort - at 2012.11.15 07:49:00
|
183. Sticky:Dev Blog: Fifty-Nine Down - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
So Cruise Missiles are left behind for further expansions/patches?
- by Fon Revedhort - at 2012.11.15 06:39:00
|
184. command ship change/fix - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Agreed that Nightmare-style 100% damage bonus (later spread onto Marauders) is very reasonable for CS. That way it's possible to pick between guns+links or guns+utility with no option of min-maxing and going for full gank. The only tough point is...
- by Fon Revedhort - at 2012.11.12 06:02:00
|
185. Opening up Low Sec - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
They can spawn Concord at gates and this will change nothing since carebears still will be scanned down at their sites and killed like fish in a barrel. All it does is creating another obstacle for PvP, along with sec status hits and so on. At th...
- by Fon Revedhort - at 2012.11.11 14:45:00
|
186. ECM mechanics - How it works in real life - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
There's no player skill involved into jamming (and EW in general) because otherwise fail-players will have hard time playing, just like they have hard time doing maneuvers and kiting - things highly dependant on individual skills. But actually, y...
- by Fon Revedhort - at 2012.11.10 10:00:00
|
187. CNR, SNI and Golem comparison, using cruise missiles - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Firestorm Delta wrote: Not sure why you'd even bother with Cruise on a Golem. To PvP.
- by Fon Revedhort - at 2012.11.09 15:23:00
|
188. Vagabond Perma-MWD - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Hatsumi Kobayashi wrote: ISD LackOfFaith wrote: Whether the fit works in practice or not (it really might, I don't know), I'd like to remind the OP (and others) of a few things: An ISD that has some knowledge about how the game works? W...
- by Fon Revedhort - at 2012.11.09 05:16:00
|
189. Sticky:[Winter] Disruption Cruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Sean Parisi wrote: Fon Revedhort wrote: Nikuno wrote: Sean Parisi wrote: I have tried an E-War Celestis Setup. Heavily tanked, (23589 EHP) 4 dampeners. It has been able to damp down majority of ships to 12km. For a 2 vs 1 situation thi...
- by Fon Revedhort - at 2012.11.08 20:54:00
|
190. Sticky:[Winter] Disruption Cruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Nikuno wrote: Sean Parisi wrote: I have tried an E-War Celestis Setup. Heavily tanked, (23589 EHP) 4 dampeners. It has been able to damp down majority of ships to 12km. For a 2 vs 1 situation this ship could be devastating if focused on one ...
- by Fon Revedhort - at 2012.11.08 19:51:00
|
191. Upcoming BC/BS/CS Changes - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Lili Lu wrote: The interesting part will be the cuts in a slot from the tier 2s (and presumably the Cyclone as well?). For some ships like the Drake and Harby they could lose that 8th high and it would have no effect on either ship. That woul...
- by Fon Revedhort - at 2012.11.08 19:46:00
|
192. Ideas for new modules - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Andreus Ixiris wrote: We'd need to think of a better name for it, but for now, call it "Cyno Poisoner." Write some technobabble about it causing metamorphic fluctuations in the quantum foam or something, but the gist is that when you use it on ...
- by Fon Revedhort - at 2012.11.08 17:57:00
|
193. Sticky:Dev Blog: Back to the balancing future! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Ravcharas wrote: Fon Revedhort wrote: Also, their initial success have been yet another proof of how absurdly overtanked EVE is. DPS/tank ratio of tier3 BC is what all ships should have. Or close to it. And it had been that way before CCP in...
- by Fon Revedhort - at 2012.11.08 17:49:00
|
194. High EHP ship for moving small valuable things AFK - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Damnation might be your choice.
- by Fon Revedhort - at 2012.11.08 14:05:00
|
195. Sticky:Dev Blog: Back to the balancing future! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
DeBingJos wrote: I wonder if I'm the only one that regrets the tier 3 battlecruisers are in the game. Imo the game was better off without them. I think so as well, but they may actually become balanced over time. Also, their initial success ...
- by Fon Revedhort - at 2012.11.08 14:01:00
|
196. Sticky:[Winter] Ewar Tweaks for Retribution - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Morrigan LeSante wrote: Fon Revedhort wrote: Pinky Denmark wrote: Whatever you do just make sure to buff the tank on ecm ships in equal measures to the nerf they take on ecm Most ecm ships already can fit quite considerable overtank, gi...
- by Fon Revedhort - at 2012.11.08 13:21:00
|
197. Sticky:Dev Blog: Back to the balancing future! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Viribus wrote: Fon Revedhort wrote: Debir Achen wrote: Now, you might claim that a single ship + mindlink can give all the boost that matters. That could be considered as an argument that said set of boosts is relatively overpowered (vs ...
- by Fon Revedhort - at 2012.11.08 11:37:00
|
198. Sticky:[Winter] Ewar Tweaks for Retribution - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Pinky Denmark wrote: Whatever you do just make sure to buff the tank on ecm ships in equal measures to the nerf they take on ecm Most ecm ships already can fit quite considerable overtank, given how they have plenty of mids, some have tech2 r...
- by Fon Revedhort - at 2012.11.08 11:29:00
|
199. Sticky:Dev Blog: Back to the balancing future! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Debir Achen wrote: Now, you might claim that a single ship + mindlink can give all the boost that matters. That could be considered as an argument that said set of boosts is relatively overpowered (vs the other options), rather than a criticis...
- by Fon Revedhort - at 2012.11.08 02:41:00
|
200. Sticky:[Winter] Ewar Tweaks for Retribution - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Morrigan LeSante wrote: Fon Revedhort wrote: No. It's possible to fight 1 vs 10+ (at least for me) .... and you think there's a problem with ECM because it stops you doing 1v10........ For some it's 1 vs 2 or 2 vs 3, digits are not...
- by Fon Revedhort - at 2012.11.07 15:16:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |